Відео

Great video! For me personally, working on my books, I like to think of the midpoint as the moment where the Hero's Ugly Truth is demonstrated to them. Not said, but seen, cause it's not really excepted until that 75% breaking point. This Ugly Truth idea came from a Michael Arndt video, and it was like a big light bulb for me! It might be the same thing as "Need" as opposed to Want, but Ugly Truth does something visceral for me.

Trends like this need to stop forever! They ruin everything! Enough with this “cultural sensitivity” crap! 😡

この吹き替え版が最高！

A GEM! Wonderful interview. Thank you so much for uploading this. Please keep it up.

Shout out to you bro. This deserves more views.

この園遊会のシーン。 この時、スカーレット・オハラは16歳って設定。 レット・バトラーに初めて会うのもこの時。 16歳。 高校1年生（笑）。 岩戸鈴芽（すずめの戸締り）より年下。 ※レットは未成年淫行条例違反だな。

I made a comment below to agree with one of many posts here that disagree with your suggestion that the restored version was botched. And to all those who posted here, I wanted to share a valuable link to an interview of James Mason, shortly before the new restored version was officially presented. In the beginning of the interview and near the end Mr Mason seems to infer he has seen the restored version and praises the restorers for the work done, using stills artfully and creatively to tell the story visually and align with the VoiceOver. He also relays facts about the original film and puts 100% of the blame all on Harry Warner, the brother of Jack Warner. As Harry wanted to make more money. And Mr Mason states as a fact he is certain that Harry demanded the film be cut. He mentions George Cukor was out of the country at the time and in no way would have allowed this if he knew Harry was doing this. Mr Mason said he heard nothing about the film being too long for viewers. In fact he said the audience loved the original version. Mr Mason did praise Jack Warner for having the courage to do a 3 hour version knowing it was a masterpiece, but blames Warner for being stupid as a film leader to not have done an intermission. Instead he listened to Harry. Mr Mason also gives credit to Sid Luft and to Judy. He states that he had no issues with Judy during the making of this film. And furthermore he is extremely pleased with the results of using stills in the sequence actions as so creatively done that he feels future film makers may copy this effect! I could be wrong but in the very beginning I think Mr Mason relays to the interviewer that he will not be present for the official showing of the restored version. I am very disappointed in your accusations that the restored version was botched. Considering it was done during a time when there was limited or no computer technology, it's quite amazing the segue done. I respect your opinion but I agree with the many here who feel it was beautifully done. As Mr Mason himself praises the restoration... ua-cam.com/video/PnOFatq-UCI/v-deo.html

Very interesting video. Great work!

Okay. We need to introduce characters, but what if the story starts before the character is born? Do we play it like forest gump and barely introduce the main character then go back forty years in time? Is there a better way if it’s meant to be more of a non fictional narrative story?

Hello. This is great. Thank you. I’ve watched many videos trying to teach me this and it makes more sense now that I’ve heard this. Thanks.

This was a very well presented lecture. I graduated film school a little over a decade ago primarily for screenwriting and in all my time there they did not tell me how to get a job. I remember even asking if you're supposed to get an agent or something and still didn't even get a clear answer on that. That would another good topic to discuss. I came across your video because of the idea of backward engineering a script. I'm one of those people that can come up with ideas all day everyday but struggles at discerning which ideas are worth pursuing and which to just let go so I can get one of them done. So I've been approaching my next screenplay as figuring out what are elements that make a screenplay obviously good and creating a story to fit that framework. As a big fan of existential creators like David Lynch and Charlie Kaufman, I think the best films are often not what I would call obviously good, but taking this approach is a way to be more decisive and work on a project more likely to actually sell. A great script might not hook the audience from the very first moment, but like what you say, it's better to hook the audience from the beginning and thus I feel an obviously great script must have the goal of hooking the audience from the first moment. I think in general, an obviously great script is almost always going to follow convention or at least be very coherent about it.

She became a Christian and it saved her life 8 marriages a murder with her boyfriend and daughter

Loved her and such a beauty

Does the man ever smile?

I love her

loke

Not a big fan of hers to be truthful. But man, if she thought movies were bad back then, she has not seen anything like today. Also that V show she was in, was that really a great work of Television? Also, in my top ten films of all time, 5 would come after this interview, RAN, SHILNDLER'S LIST, KUNG FU HUSTLE, INCEPTION, and READY PLAYER ONE. The oness before are, CITIZEN KANE, THIRD MAN, HIROSHIMA MON AMOUR, ONCE UPON A TIME IN THE WEST and GODFATHER PART II. No doubt IMITATION OF LIFE, and BAD AND THE BEAUTIFUL were goood.

She was very beautiful as well as being a good actress. I saw the movie the Post Man Rings Twice..

I ran into this interview on UA-cam. It’s amazing how she was on-point on where we are today. One of my very favorite actresses.

Love all her movies and The Bad and The Beautiful is one of my favorites

17:05 "Do you eat?" I love it!

WONDERFUL LANA SUPERSTAR ONCE GORGEOUS ALWAYS GORGEOUS ⭐️⭐️⭐️🌟🌟💐💐💐

Excellent points for the pros and cons of AI. Thank you for this great video!

never the sharpest knife in the drawer

What a beautiful woman and a very fine actress. I loved her in Madam X and Imitation Of Life, I still cry at both of these movies.

What show was Osborne on?

She was the ABSOLUTE EPITOME of charm, grace and elegance - VERY MUCH MISSING from actresses today!!!!!

Are you implying that he has a sexual relationship with his ex-girlfriend's mother? Because that is not the case.

Her views about Hollywood movies align with todays UA-cam film critics

Her eloquence is unparalleled

I could listen to Eve all day.

Great job! Glad to see you are back doing reviews!!

I saw the restored version when it was first screened in London about 40 years ago. I saw it in Notting Hill. I can hardly believe that more time has elapsed since then than between the shooting of the movie and when I first saw it in the cinema! I had seen the cut down version on BBC TV and loved it but watching the longer, big screen version in a packed cinema shared with an enthralled audience was a revelation. It was a triumph, stills and long shots with doubles included. It’s a truly magnificent film, one of the greatest ever made, with fantastic performances not just from the 2 leads, but from Tommy Noonan, Charles Bickford, Jack Carson - everybody. The musical arrangements are brilliant, Cukor’s handling of the whole thing makes it an epic, a masterpiece, with several outstanding iconic moments. I’ve never heard anyone criticise I was Born in a Trunk for its modernist stylised settings, the reverse actually. Let’s keep on discussing this definitive Hollywood movie, it’s so so worthy of our love and admiration.

Welcome back.

There is SO MUCH misinformation and outright stupidity in this video that I don't even know where to begin! Before you pontificate, learn the facts. First, the film was not "rushed" into release. The 182 minute version was absolutely the version that Cukor and Garland wanted to be seen. Second, Cukor NEVER saw the restoration! If you had bothered to read Haver's book, you would know that he died the night before he was to see it. So all your garbage about him hating it is something you made up yourself. Third, the guy who was arrested was NOT Michael Arick, who was rumored to have a complete print. It was a different collector, who only had "Lose That Long Face". It's doubtful that Arick has anything more than some outtakes he rescued from the garbage. Fourth, ONLY 6 1/2 MINUTES of the film are still photos! Is that really too much for your small mind to handle? If so, you don't deserve this great film. In order to remove those 61/2 minutes, you'd have to also cut the surrounding 20 minutes of live-action footage, recreating the crime that led Cukor never to watch the butchered version. Finally, regardless of what your (I think apocryphal) "film class" thought, the restored 178-minute version has been applauded and loved by literally millions. You can't handle a few minutes of stills? Fine - leave this masterpiece to those of us with a drop of imagination - we think it's great, thank you very much. Just delete this worthless video.

This ceremony is a treasure. Hitch deserved it. He had that dry humor till the end. And Cary Grant’s wonderful smile, and Jimmy’s unassuming charm made this night so special.👏

You are FABULOUS!!!!!!!!

Thank you for this excellent content. Your insights are top-tier and entirely non-speculative.

ワア!　オードリーの吹替えは定番の池田昌子さん❣ 現発売中のDVDにも吹替え未収録なのでウレシイです! オードリーの吹替えは池田さんがサイコー～ 貴重な放映分見せてくださりありがとうございます💞

日本テレビ初放映のものですね! ついに「風ー」がテレビで放映されると放映前から 大々的なニュースだった😊放映権料もかなりだったはず 栗原さん吹替えも話題で貴重なもの久々見ることができ感謝です!

Amazing interviewer and interview.

Wonderful, witty and lovely lady. Very much unlike her glib screen persona, she was quiet and devoted to her family. My Dad loved watching her because she reminded him of my Aunt, his older sister. What a talented woman she was ❤

If you can't be an athlete, be an athletic supporter! (......)

At 8:40 Eve looks so uncomfortable agreeing that “there was truth to Mommie dearest”. Firstly because Eve’s generation didn’t write books like Mommie dearest nor air their dirty laundry- that came with the boomers. Also she’s trying to give an honest answer to a very difficult and upsetting series of questions. Allegations of Child abuse are major. Personally I think the truth of Joan is somewhere in the middle.

What an elegant presence. ❤❤❤❤

Fascinating

So-called "Eve Arden" wasn't even her real name. She was born Eunice Mary Quedens. She obviously changed her birth name as the result of pressure by 'Hollywood' Moguls & Studios?! Allowing their deceit, misrepresentation, anticipated greater recognition & love for the almighty buck, shows disrespect of family name & heritage.

主様に感謝します

What an intelligent, elegant Lady!!!

津嘉山さんのコミカル演技珍しい 最後池田勝さん？素っ頓狂な